If you decide to buy our C1000-178 study materials, you will never miss any important information, With higher salary and bright future, even greater chances of getting promotion, you have no time to waste but choose our C1000-178 pass-for-sure braindumps: IBM Cognos Analytics Administrator v12 - Professional now, IBM C1000-178 Answers Free Online study has many advantages, We are being imitated so many years, but never being surpassed, our high passing rate of C1000-178 exams cram makes us keep a good reputation in this line.
Incorporating an advanced approach to presenting https://getfreedumps.passreview.com/C1000-178-exam-questions.html information about Red Hat Linux, the book aims to provide the best and latest information intermediate to advanced Red Hat users need to know Test ACP-01101 Questions Answers about installation, configuration, system administration, server operations, and security.
Microsoft Mobile Explorer, mobile Internet, Pixo Internet, vendors C1000-178 Updated Testkings for, Brain imaging research has shown that to remain committed to a new decision, the left frontal cortex of the brain has to activate.
Engaged employees can smell stupid management tricks a mile away, On Windows Free C1000-178 Vce Dumps XP, File and Printer sharing is an item in the firewall's Exceptions list, It is essentially rooted in the existence of justice" humans.
Create a New Document Library, Krzysztof: The book https://lead2pass.guidetorrent.com/C1000-178-dumps-questions.html was really successful, people found it useful, but now the framework moved forward, Real-time systems have been on the market for years because there Answers C1000-178 Free has long been a need for systems to control industrial systems, robotics, and similar systems.
C1000-178 Answers Free 100% Pass | Professional C1000-178 Test Questions Answers: IBM Cognos Analytics Administrator v12 - Professional
After they had privately come to a probability that they were comfortable Exam Dumps C1000-178 Collection with, I had each person share their number and recorded it in an Excel spreadsheet, We were just collecting the payments they owed us.
Roaming Between Centralized Controllers, Active Directory Valid Exam PEGAPCBA87V1 Blueprint in a Real-Life Global Organization, Our exercises and answers and are very close true examination questions.
Rich also actively serves on the board of Answers C1000-178 Free directors for both the Men's Senior Baseball League and the Suffolk Stan Musial Baseball League, Certainly, this means increased Exam C1000-178 Demo competition among job hunters, which isn't welcome news for those seeking work.
If you decide to buy our C1000-178 study materials, you will never miss any important information, With higher salary and bright future, even greater chances of getting promotion, you have no time to waste but choose our C1000-178 pass-for-sure braindumps: IBM Cognos Analytics Administrator v12 - Professional now!
Popular C1000-178 Answers Free to pass IBM Cognos Analytics Administrator v12 - Professional - Recommend by Many People
Online study has many advantages, We are being imitated so many years, but never being surpassed, our high passing rate of C1000-178 exams cram makes us keep a good reputation in this line.
There are 24/7 customer assisting support you when you have any questions, Answers C1000-178 Free allows you takes only 20 to 30 hours to practice before you take the exam, This allows our data to make you more focused on preparation.
Some people think our fame is not a patch on many large companies as they put more money on advertisement, our C1000-178 certification training is more accurate than them, our total pass rate is higher than them too.
Many company requests candidates not only have Answers C1000-178 Free work experiences, but also some professional certifications, There exists a fierce competition in the market, The PDF version of our C1000-178 study tool is very practical, which is mainly reflected on the special function.
You should not be confused anymore, because our C1000-178 learning materials have greater accuracy over other peers, If you have interests with our C1000-178 practice materials, we prefer to tell that we have contacted with many former buyers of our C1000-178 exam questions and they all talked about the importance of effective C1000-178 practice material playing a crucial role in your preparation process.
We guarantee to full refund you if failed the exam with C1000-178 dumps valid, Our C1000-178 Exam Dumps with the highest quality which consists of all of the key points required for the C1000-178 exam can really be considered as the royal road to learning.
The introduction is mentioned as follows.
NEW QUESTION: 1
An organization plans to implement multifactor authentication techniques within the enterprise network architecture. Each authentication factor is expected to be a unique control.
Which of the following BEST describes the proper employment of multifactor authentication?
A. Fingerprint scanner, voice recognition, proximity card
B. Voice recognition, smart card, proximity card
C. Proximity card, fingerprint scanner, PIN
D. Smart card, user PKI certificate, privileged user certificate
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION: 2
Which of the following is NOT an example of preventive control?
A. User login screen which allows only authorize user to access website
B. Duplicate checking of a calculations
C. Physical access control like locks and door
D. Encrypt the data so that only authorize user can view the same
Answer: B
Explanation:
The word NOT is used as a keyword in the question. You need to find out a security control from an given options which in not preventive. Duplicate checking of a calculation is a detective control and not a preventive control. For your exam you should know below information about different security controls
Deterrent Controls Deterrent Controls are intended to discourage a potential attacker. Access controls act as a deterrent to threats and attacks by the simple fact that the existence of the control is enough to keep some potential attackers from attempting to circumvent the control. This is often because the effort required to circumvent the control is far greater than the potential reward if the attacker is successful, or, conversely, the negative implications of a failed attack (or getting caught) outweigh the benefits of success. For example, by forcing the identification and authentication of a user, service, or application, and all that it implies, the potential for incidents associated with the system is significantly reduced because an attacker will fear association with the incident. If there are no controls for a given access path, the number of incidents and the potential impact become infinite. Controls inherently reduce exposure to risk by applying oversight for a process. This oversight acts as a deterrent, curbing an attacker's appetite in the face of probable repercussions. The best example of a deterrent control is demonstrated by employees and their propensity to intentionally perform unauthorized functions, leading to unwanted events. When users begin to understand that by authenticating into a system to perform a function, their activities are logged and monitored, and it reduces the likelihood they will attempt such an action. Many threats are based on the anonymity of the threat agent, and any potential for identification and association with their actions is avoided at all costs. It is this fundamental reason why access controls are the key target of circumvention by attackers. Deterrents also take the form of potential punishment if users do something unauthorized. For example, if the organization policy specifies that an employee installing an unauthorized wireless access point will be fired, that will determine most employees from installing wireless access points.
Preventative Controls Preventive controls are intended to avoid an incident from occurring. Preventative access controls keep a user from performing some activity or function. Preventative controls differ from deterrent controls in that the control is not optional and cannot (easily) be bypassed. Deterrent controls work on the theory that it is easier to obey the control rather than to risk the consequences of bypassing the control. In other words, the power for action resides with the user (or the attacker). Preventative controls place the power of action with the system, obeying the control is not optional. The only way to bypass the control is to find a flaw in the control's implementation.
Compensating Controls Compensating controls are introduced when the existing capabilities of a system do not support the requirement of a policy. Compensating controls can be technical, procedural, or managerial. Although an existing system may not support the required controls, there may exist other technology or processes that can supplement the existing environment, closing the gap in controls, meeting policy requirements, and reducing overall risk. For example, the access control policy may state that the authentication process must be encrypted when performed over the Internet. Adjusting an application to natively support encryption for authentication purposes may be too costly. Secure Socket Layer (SSL), an encryption protocol, can be employed and layered on top of the authentication process to support the policy statement. Other examples include a separation of duties environment, which offers the capability to isolate certain tasks to compensate for technical limitations in the system and ensure the security of transactions. In addition, management processes, such as authorization, supervision, and administration, can be used to compensate for gaps in the access control environment.
Detective Controls Detective controls warn when something has happened, and are the earliest point in the post-incident timeline. Access controls are a deterrent to threats and can be aggressively utilized to prevent harmful incidents through the application of least privilege. However, the detective nature of access controls can provide significant visibility into the access environment and help organizations manage their access strategy and related security risk. As mentioned previously, strongly managed access privileges provided to an authenticated user offer the ability to reduce the risk exposure of the enterprise's assets by limiting the capabilities that authenticated user has. However, there are few options to control what a user can perform once privileges are provided. For example, if a user is provided write access to a file and that file is damaged, altered, or otherwise negatively impacted (either deliberately or unintentionally), the use of applied access controls will offer visibility into the transaction. The control environment can be established to log activity regarding the identification, authentication, authorization, and use of privileges on a system. This can be used to detect the occurrence of errors, the attempts to perform an unauthorized action, or to validate when provided credentials were exercised. The logging system as a detective device provides evidence of actions (both successful and unsuccessful) and tasks that were executed by authorized users.
Corrective Controls When a security incident occurs, elements within the security infrastructure may require corrective actions. Corrective controls are actions that seek to alter the security posture of an environment to correct any deficiencies and return the environment to a secure state. A security incident signals the failure of one or more directive, deterrent, preventative, or compensating controls. The detective controls may have triggered an alarm or notification, but now the corrective controls must work to stop the incident in its tracks. Corrective controls can take many forms, all depending on the particular situation at hand or the particular security failure that needs to be dealt with.
Recovery Controls Any changes to the access control environment, whether in the face of a security incident or to offer temporary compensating controls, need to be accurately reinstated and returned to normal operations. There are several situations that may affect access controls, their applicability, status, or management. Events can include system outages, attacks, project changes, technical demands, administrative gaps, and full-blown disaster situations. For example, if an application is not correctly installed or deployed, it may adversely affect controls placed on system files or even have default administrative accounts unknowingly implemented upon install. Additionally, an employee may be transferred, quit, or be on temporary leave that may affect policy requirements regarding separation of duties. An attack on systems may have resulted in the implantation of a Trojan horse program, potentially exposing private user information, such as credit card information and financial data. In all of these cases, an undesirable situation must be rectified as quickly as possible and controls returned to normal operations.
For your exam you should know below information about different security controls
Deterrent Controls Deterrent Controls are intended to discourage a potential attacker. Access controls act as a deterrent to threats and attacks by the simple fact that the existence of the control is enough to keep some potential attackers from attempting to circumvent the control. This is often because the effort required to circumvent the control is far greater than the potential reward if the attacker is successful, or, conversely, the negative implications of a failed attack (or getting caught) outweigh the benefits of success. For example, by forcing the identification and authentication of a user, service, or application, and all that it implies, the potential for incidents associated with the system is significantly reduced because an attacker will fear association with the incident. If there are no controls for a given access path, the number of incidents and the potential impact become infinite. Controls inherently reduce exposure to risk by applying oversight for a process. This oversight acts as a deterrent, curbing an attacker's appetite in the face of probable repercussions.
The best example of a deterrent control is demonstrated by employees and their propensity to intentionally perform unauthorized functions, leading to unwanted events. When users begin to understand that by authenticating into a system to perform a function, their activities are logged and monitored, and it reduces the likelihood they will attempt such an action. Many threats are based on the anonymity of the threat agent, and any potential for identification and association with their actions is avoided at all costs. It is this fundamental reason why access controls are the key target of circumvention by attackers. Deterrents also take the form of potential punishment if users do something unauthorized. For example, if the organization policy specifies that an employee installing an unauthorized wireless access point will be fired, that will determine most employees from installing wireless access points.
Preventative Controls Preventive controls are intended to avoid an incident from occurring. Preventative access controls keep a user from performing some activity or function. Preventative controls differ from deterrent controls in that the control is not optional and cannot (easily) be bypassed. Deterrent controls work on the theory that it is easier to obey the control rather than to risk the consequences of bypassing the control. In other words, the power for action resides with the user (or the attacker). Preventative controls place the power of action with the system, obeying the control is not optional. The only way to bypass the control is to find a flaw in the control's implementation.
Compensating Controls Compensating controls are introduced when the existing capabilities of a system do not support the requirement of a policy. Compensating controls can be technical, procedural, or managerial. Although an existing system may not support the required controls, there may exist other technology or processes that can supplement the existing environment, closing the gap in controls, meeting policy requirements, and reducing overall risk.
For example, the access control policy may state that the authentication process must be encrypted when performed over the Internet. Adjusting an application to natively support encryption for authentication purposes may be too costly. Secure Socket Layer (SSL), an encryption protocol, can be employed and layered on top of the authentication process to support the policy statement.
Other examples include a separation of duties environment, which offers the capability to isolate certain tasks to compensate for technical limitations in the system and ensure the security of transactions. In addition, management processes, such as authorization, supervision, and administration, can be used to compensate for gaps in the access control environment.
Detective Controls Detective controls warn when something has happened, and are the earliest point in the post-incident timeline. Access controls are a deterrent to threats and can be aggressively utilized to prevent harmful incidents through the application of least privilege. However, the detective nature of access controls can provide significant visibility into the access environment and help organizations manage their access strategy and related security risk. As mentioned previously, strongly managed access privileges provided to an authenticated user offer the ability to reduce the risk exposure of the enterprise's assets by limiting the capabilities that authenticated user has. However, there are few options to control what a user can perform once privileges are provided. For example, if a user is provided write access to a file and that file is damaged, altered, or otherwise negatively impacted (either deliberately or unintentionally), the use of applied access controls will offer visibility into the transaction. The control environment can be established to log activity regarding the identification, authentication, authorization, and use of privileges on a system. This can be used to detect the occurrence of errors, the attempts to perform an unauthorized action, or to validate when provided credentials were exercised. The logging system as a detective device provides evidence of actions (both successful and unsuccessful) and tasks that were executed by authorized users.
Corrective Controls When a security incident occurs, elements within the security infrastructure may require corrective actions. Corrective controls are actions that seek to alter the security posture of an environment to correct any deficiencies and return the environment to a secure state. A security incident signals the failure of one or more directive, deterrent, preventative, or compensating controls. The detective controls may have triggered an alarm or notification, but now the corrective controls must work to stop the incident in its tracks. Corrective controls can take many forms, all depending on the particular situation at hand or the particular security failure that needs to be dealt with.
Recovery Controls Any changes to the access control environment, whether in the face of a security incident or to offer temporary compensating controls, need to be accurately reinstated and returned to normal operations. There are several situations that may affect access controls, their applicability, status, or management. Events can include system outages, attacks, project changes, technical demands, administrative gaps, and full-blown disaster situations. For example, if an application is not correctly installed or deployed, it may adversely affect controls placed on system files or even have default
administrative accounts unknowingly implemented upon install.
Additionally, an employee may be transferred, quit, or be on temporary leave that may affect policy
requirements regarding separation of duties. An attack on systems may have resulted in the
implantation of a Trojan horse program, potentially exposing private user information, such as
credit card information and financial data. In all of these cases, an undesirable situation must be
rectified as quickly as possible and controls returned to normal operations.
The following answers are incorrect:
The other examples are belongs to Preventive control.
The following reference(s) were/was used to create this question:
CISA Review Manual 2014 Page number 44 and
Official ISC2 CISSP guide 3rd edition Page number 50 and 51
NEW QUESTION: 3
Daily business intelligence pages provide summarized content for a particular functional area. Name three feature that the page contain. (Choose three)
A. Key performance indicator (KPIs)
B. Regions
C. Reports
D. Responsibilities
E. Parameters
Answer: A,B,E
Recent Comments